I would write essays and fanfiction like devotionals, and I wouldregularly praise the series and JK Rowling with the kind of fanaticism that wasborderline evangelical. My bedroom was effectively a Harry Potter shrine and I had a bookshelf covered in paraphernaliareminiscent of an altar. Everything I said or did I connected back to Harry Potter and anyone who insulted theseries may as well have spat upon my God.
All of those things are non-human and often unnatural, making the implication that those nonbinary individuals, too, are unnatural. In general, if you’re centering a species or non-human entity as nonbinary, make sure to approach nonbinary humans in the text itself, even if you do so simply by having the non-human entity aware of their gender in relation to human gender concepts. head canon genorator Reliability Not all canon is created equal. When we, as fans of a property, examine lore to determine how useful it is to our purposes, we need to recognize that the source of what we believe is canon isn’t actually very useful.
While roleplayers are often given some degree of leniency for in character behavior, that doesn't mean you can post things that are inappropriate as far as the ToS is concerned. That extends not only to your posts, but also to character descriptions. For best results, I recommend utilizing both 2 and 3 together in varying amounts. Work around the lore to explore your creativity and work with the lore to help ground it into what already exists within the world.
But you're not sure they're actually doing that, because you don't roleplay. Admittedly I haven't been involved in the roleplaying community on Homecoming, so maybe they don't have that issue here. It sure seemed to be an issue on the retail servers though. ALL the Zig maps show some level of damage, and ingame text makes it clear the place is in a constant state of "under repair from one or more breaches". Which makes perfect sense, considering that supermax or no, it's still an effort to keep superhumans (some of whom are capable of Boomtown-level destruction) locked up with mostly mundane technology. Breaches WILL happen even without outside shenanigans, and they're going to be messy when they do.
As we move further into 2024, character headcanon generator generators stand as a testament to the intersection of technology and creativity. They offer endless possibilities for character development, enhancing both storytelling and role-playing experiences. By embracing these tools, creators can push the boundaries of their imagination, crafting characters that are as unique and complex as the stories they inhabit. Whether you're a writer, a gamer, or simply someone who loves to create, character headcanon generators provide the inspiration and support needed to bring your characters to life in new and exciting ways.
Even if it doesn’t sound exactly the same at least they’re still THERE. • Levi calls Erwin blondie in situations where he doesn’t have to call him Commander, this is a headcanon of mine simply because of that one time Levi called him blondie. [2] Note that I use "text"to refer to any original material that a fandom derives from, whether it be anactual book, or a film, or a TV series, etc. that is not actually consumedprimarily via text.
• Considering how much he appreciates hygiene, letting his horse lick him is a pretty big thing, so I've decided to run with that and consider Levi particularly close with his horse. He used to smoke, but gave it up - ‘cos heart reasons. Understand the world with a daily explainer plus the most compelling stories of the day. Our mission is to provide clear, accessible journalism that empowers you to stay informed and engaged in shaping our world. By becoming a Vox Member, you directly strengthen our ability to deliver in-depth, independent reporting that drives meaningful change.
And if a comic book writer wants to say that the Bates/Weisman take on Captain Atom is the one that they are using for their story, then that's great. However, if a comic book writer wants to use a different take on the character, like the Batman/Superman one, that's fine, as well. None of them are WRONG because your personal take on the character isn't the one being used. You're certainly free to disagree with the approach, but it's one thing to disagree with an approach, and it's a whole other thing to say that the approach is WRONG. I guess the best description for them is "thought experiments," that become popular on social media. You know, like, "What superhero would be the most likely to do X?," and more stuff like that.